Top of Page
Main

AI Guidance for Educators and Staff

As educators and staff at CPS, GenAI tools present an opportunity to elevate our educational delivery and streamline administrative tasks. Guided by the principles outlined in our High-Quality Curriculum Implementation Framework, we strive to harness these technologies in ways that enhance efficiency and amplify the educational experiences rooted in our high-quality curricular materials.

Guidance for All Staff

  • AI Trust Illustration

    Responsible Use

    As role models, it is imperative that our staff exemplify ethical use of GenAI tools. This includes maintaining transparency by appropriately citing or disclosing the use of GenAI, and ensuring the content generated has been critically evaluated for bias, hallucinations, and quality, and is suitable for educational purposes. Additionally, staff may enter confidential data only into GenAI tools that have approved data privacy agreements with the District, including but not limited to student record information, confidential employee information, and any identifying information. As a further precaution, staff are advised to turn off chat history and data training in the settings of any GenAI tool used in their professional practice.

  • AI Tools Illustration

    Tool Approval and Use

    Staff members are required to use only GenAI tools that have been vetted and approved by CPS, as reflected in the EdTech Catalog. A tool’s approval within the EdTech Catalog reflects that it meets the District’s standards for privacy, security, and confidentiality in compliance with all applicable state and federal laws. However, it does not reflect that the tool meets the District’s academic standards for verification, bias, fairness, or output quality. Educators and staff should refer to the badges associated with each tool to understand when a tool may not meet these standards. This policy ensures that the tools align with our educational goals and adhere to our rigorous data privacy and security standards.

  • Generative AI illustration

    Monitoring Safe Use

    Staff using GenAI tools with students are responsible for ensuring that students engage with these tools responsibly, maintaining an awareness of age limitations, permissions, and well-being, and clearly communicating expectations to students and families. School staff should report instances of misuse to their principal or designee, and be prepared to develop alternate activities that do not require the use of GenAI for students who lose the privilege of GenAI access or whose families do not consent.

  • AI Sustainable Icon

    Meaningful Use: Instructional Opportunities

    As with any new student-facing technology, the introduction of GenAI tools invites educators to consider how GenAI can further the underlying goals of their activities and assignments instead of impeding them. The Instructional Practice AI Operating Committee was created in light of this, the steadily increasing demand for Generative AI skills in the workforce, and our commitment to preparing students for a rapidly changing world.

    For guidance and concrete ideas on incorporating GenAI tools in your instructional practices, visit the Instructional GenAI Playbook.

Guidance for Administrators

As leaders within Chicago Public Schools, administrators play a critical role for effective AI integration in their communities by overseeing the use and governance of Generative AI tools and the development of AI Literacy in their communities. In addition to adhering to all previously outlined guidelines applicable to all stakeholders and staff, administrators have additional responsibilities to ensure these tools are used safely, responsibly, and meaningfully.

Guidance for ITS

It’s essential to follow standard software engineering best practices to minimize potential bias and ensure data quality in GenAI models. Our teams must adhere to these practices throughout the development and management of GenAI software and applications, emphasizing security and safety at every stage.